#Zeiss for mamiya 7 ii Patch

And if IвЂ™d borrowed the 150mm lens off of Anais and had pursued some portraiture then IвЂ™m certain IвЂ™d have benefitted from being able to focus easier. In fact, for all but a few of the shots IвЂ™ve taken with either Makina 67 or Mamiya 7, IвЂ™ve scale focused, and where IвЂ™ve needed the rangefinder, IвЂ™m mostly been shooting at a reasonable distance where accuracy isnвЂ™t paramount anyway.

#Zeiss for mamiya 7 ii Patch

To me, landscape photography benefits from the extra clarity that medium format brings, but the benefit a distinct rangefinder patch brings is fairly nominal. The subject matter I enjoy shooting with medium format cameras is landscapes. To me, medium format cameras are best suited to subject matter thatвЂ™s suited to the fact that all that extra film brings more clarity to the party. The reason it doesnвЂ™t matter so much to me when it comes to medium format gear is simply what I would choose to use these types of camera for. I say this fairly objectively, but subjectively I also much prefer this type of rangefinder patch and would actually go as far to say that I find the soft edged patch found in the Makina 67 and cameras such as the Canon P makes them quite a bit more difficult to useвЂ¦ at least as rangefinder cameras. The hard-edged more distinct rangefinder patch the Mamiya offers is definitely of a higher standard than the Makina. 6.1 Final Score: Makina 67 4:0 Mamiya 7Дespite the Mamiya 7 losing the battle, I suppose itвЂ™s only fair to first point out that Anais was seemingly right about the two things he asserted.And though the Mamiya put up a good fight, the reasons my preferences remain with my Makina 67, it didnвЂ™t just come down to size. The Makina 67 wins this battle in my world. I was intrigued to know if either or both of these factors could sway my opinion or preferences toward a Mamiya, or if my overall preference for smaller easier-to-carry cameras would win out. Is that the rangefinder patch isnвЂ™t all that great, so by this merit the Mamiya must have a better patch to focus with. The second was that the rangefinder patch in the Mamiya 7 is excellent. The first was that he thinks the 80mm lens is sharper than the Nikkor on the Makina. The bigger they are, the less I find myself inclined to carry themвЂ¦ so I certainly wasnвЂ™t going to be happy carrying a bigger camera and two extra lenses.ДЄs I remember it, Anais wanted me to try the Mamiya 7 for a couple of reasons. I like taking photos, but I donвЂ™t really like carrying cameras. As I talk about in the Makina review, I find its size and weight only just on the right side of palatable. The most relevant to this post is my view that IвЂ™m not really a medium format person. Shooting the Makina 67 proved a few things to me. It might seem daft not to have taken him up on the loan of all three lenses, but thereвЂ™s method in my madness. I actually had to force him to only loan me the camera and 80mm lens вЂ“ if heвЂ™d had his way, IвЂ™d have been shooting it with a set of 3 lenses. It was at this yearвЂ™s Photography Show when we finally met and he handed it to me.

Of course, itвЂ™s rare I get such offers, but despite his generosity, it still took me a good 6 months to take him up on it. Over a year later, and thatвЂ™s exactly what IвЂ™ve done.ДЄnais is someone IвЂ™d been chatting to for a little while on Instagram when he got in touch and asked if IвЂ™d like to try his Mamiya 7.

He wanted to loan me Mamiya 7 so I could compare these two medium format giants. You might be wondering what this fact has to do with the Mamiya 7? Well, it all comes down to a conversation I had with a chap called Anais Faraj after I shared my Makina 67 review.

Last summer I finally bought myself one of my dream cameras, the Plaubel Makina 67.